Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11381 - 11390 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 11381 - 11390 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
William J. Gregg v. Duane H. Pedersen
of land by adverse possession. The Pedersens argue the trial court improperly shifted the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6756 - 2017-09-20
of land by adverse possession. The Pedersens argue the trial court improperly shifted the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6756 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
located. The case proceeded to trial where a jury found Lewis guilty of all of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471831 - 2022-01-11
located. The case proceeded to trial where a jury found Lewis guilty of all of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471831 - 2022-01-11
State v. Steven George Lillo
and remand the matter to the trial court with directions that it consider the videotape's admissibility under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14209 - 2012-05-09
and remand the matter to the trial court with directions that it consider the videotape's admissibility under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14209 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
that she was denied constitutional due process in this way. The trial court agreed with Michelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53665 - 2014-09-15
that she was denied constitutional due process in this way. The trial court agreed with Michelle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53665 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
(2007-08),[1] and the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46374 - 2010-01-27
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7568 - 2005-03-31
submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state in writing why its No. 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9304 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
, the court precluded Robby from submitting evidence. Robby argues: (1) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court to exercise our discretionary power of reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46374 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for a new trial. He asks this court to exercise our discretionary power of reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46374 - 2014-09-15
Robert L. Hartzell v. Paulette Hartzell
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31
, and granting joint legal custody. Luke contends that the trial court erred by: (1) failing to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9304 - 2005-03-31