Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11391 - 11400 of 30164 for de.
State v. John M. Ligon
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1993). Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5008 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74 (1993). Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5008 - 2005-03-31
City of Watertown v. Brent A. Genz
are not disputed, constitute probable cause presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14963 - 2005-03-31
are not disputed, constitute probable cause presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14963 - 2005-03-31
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
court reviews de novo. See State v. Kramar, 149 Wis. 2d 767, 791, 440 N.W.2d 317 (1989). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
court reviews de novo. See State v. Kramar, 149 Wis. 2d 767, 791, 440 N.W.2d 317 (1989). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
)(f) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15265 - 2005-03-31
)(f) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15265 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. E.S. v. Seitz, 141 Wis. 2d 180, 184, 413 N.W.2d 670 (Ct. App. 1987). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33086 - 2008-06-18
of law that we review de novo. E.S. v. Seitz, 141 Wis. 2d 180, 184, 413 N.W.2d 670 (Ct. App. 1987). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33086 - 2008-06-18
John Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
of law that we review de novo." Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477 N.W.2d 296, 302 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11133 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo." Brown v. LaChance, 165 Wis.2d 52, 65, 477 N.W.2d 296, 302 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11133 - 2005-03-31
Thomas F. Woods v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
is a question of law we review de novo. Grube v. Daun, 173 Wis.2d 30, 72, 496 N.W.2d 106, 122 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11131 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Grube v. Daun, 173 Wis.2d 30, 72, 496 N.W.2d 106, 122 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11131 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
State v. James H.
. ¶3 Fontella requested a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. In January 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 Fontella requested a de novo review of the commissioner’s order. In January 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
Goodman Forest Industries, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
facts in dispute is a question of law this court decides de novo. Oney v. Schrauth, 197 Wis.2d 891, 897
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11070 - 2005-03-31
facts in dispute is a question of law this court decides de novo. Oney v. Schrauth, 197 Wis.2d 891, 897
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11070 - 2005-03-31