Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 15305 for mark's.

[PDF] NOTICE
-90 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). ¶11 Richard argues that his trial counsel fell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 148
Bjorkman, Mark A. Solheim and Stephen P. Laitinen of Larson King, LLP of St. Paul, MN. On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29155 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is not equated with preponderance of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56207 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 56
.”) (internal quotation marks and quoted source omitted; emphasis added). There is a “reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31846 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Matthew Tyler
that the State’s reliance on the plea questionnaire misses the mark because the trial court never inquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5702 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 108
from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: MARK GEMPELER, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32918 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
reach.”[3] Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). ¶14 Circuit courts have the discretion to set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61234 - 2015-03-14

COURT OF APPEALS
as typical biological siblings. There is still the genetic question mark, there is still the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
considerations of public policy.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Whether public policy factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.’” Id. (citations and one set of quotation marks omitted). ¶9 Whether counsel’s actions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673196 - 2023-06-27