Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 44136 for name change.
Search results 11471 - 11480 of 44136 for name change.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed in March 2014. In the written judgment, the trial court: 1) Found no substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143090 - 2017-09-21
filed in March 2014. In the written judgment, the trial court: 1) Found no substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143090 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
no substantial change of circumstances as a result of Bradley’s decision to spend 100% of his time with Alan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143090 - 2015-06-15
no substantial change of circumstances as a result of Bradley’s decision to spend 100% of his time with Alan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143090 - 2015-06-15
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
for a venue[1] change to Waukesha County in 88-JV-13, pursuant to § 48.185(2), Stats. The grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14669 - 2005-03-31
for a venue[1] change to Waukesha County in 88-JV-13, pursuant to § 48.185(2), Stats. The grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14669 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of a new trial due to alleged jury compromise and refusal to change two of the jury’s special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81304 - 2012-04-24
denial of a new trial due to alleged jury compromise and refusal to change two of the jury’s special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81304 - 2012-04-24
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
Mary Ellen’s petition in 98-GN-13, Dodge County moved for a venue 1 change to Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
Mary Ellen’s petition in 98-GN-13, Dodge County moved for a venue 1 change to Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard J. Schwarten v. Leslie Smith
on June 11, 2002, the trial court found that there had been a “slight” change in the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5461 - 2017-09-19
on June 11, 2002, the trial court found that there had been a “slight” change in the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5461 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to sentence modification based on: (1) a change in parole policy; (2) a disparity between his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104656 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to sentence modification based on: (1) a change in parole policy; (2) a disparity between his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
her, and in finding no substantial change in circumstances. We affirm. ¶2 Kikkert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
her, and in finding no substantial change in circumstances. We affirm. ¶2 Kikkert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
In response to Tanner’s objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
In response to Tanner’s objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2606 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
objections, Harris’ counsel argued that two conditions had significantly changed since the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19