Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11481 - 11490 of 30164 for de.

Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
; rather, we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31

Jefferson County Child Support Agency v. Bryan J. Addie
. 1987). We review questions of law de novo. Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis. 2d 523, 528, 388 N.W.2d 170 (1986
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5819 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rodney Calhoun
, whether the State violated the plea agreement is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
actions unless those findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2007-12-26

State v. Rayna J. Bauer
constitutes probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5388 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joshua A. Propst
. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis.2d 191
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14188 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 366 (Ct. App. 1988). ¶12 In any event, the hearing before the Board of Appeals was de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96851 - 2013-05-20

State v. Anne Carol Van Dommelen
is a question of law and subject to de novo review. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18821 - 2005-07-05

State v. LeRoy J. Dean, Jr.
. We review allegations of due process and double jeopardy violations de novo. See State v. Evans, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15134 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry A. Clairmore
this court reviews de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4010 - 2005-03-31