Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11591 - 11600 of 69588 for as he.
Search results 11591 - 11600 of 69588 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Darcy N. K.
, in violation of § 948.02(1), STATS. He appeals the judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12092 - 2017-09-21
, in violation of § 948.02(1), STATS. He appeals the judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12092 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Snider
of first-degree sexual assault of a child. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
of first-degree sexual assault of a child. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. §§ 940.03, 939.05, 941.29(2)(a) (2011- 12).1 He also appeals the circuit court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249216 - 2019-10-29
. STAT. §§ 940.03, 939.05, 941.29(2)(a) (2011- 12).1 He also appeals the circuit court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249216 - 2019-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
(1), 941.30(1), 939.63(1)(b) & 939.05 (2013-14).[1] He contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24
(1), 941.30(1), 939.63(1)(b) & 939.05 (2013-14).[1] He contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147149 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
Thomas Roskos v. Mary Mellowes
that the property was for sale through Federated. He was interested in subdividing the property. After he drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11152 - 2017-09-19
that the property was for sale through Federated. He was interested in subdividing the property. After he drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11152 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mark Gilbert appeals a contempt order. He asserts: the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79060 - 2012-03-05
HOOVER, P.J.[1] Mark Gilbert appeals a contempt order. He asserts: the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79060 - 2012-03-05
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Lombard
for treatment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals two orders denying his post-judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3361 - 2005-03-31
for treatment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals two orders denying his post-judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3361 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
property in a condemnation proceeding. He asserts claims for replacement of business expenses under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34782 - 2008-12-03
property in a condemnation proceeding. He asserts claims for replacement of business expenses under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34782 - 2008-12-03