Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11601 - 11610 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————,都是不合法的,也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
argument by Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31

Langlade County v. Jessi A.
,” and providing for “termination of parental rights ... in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 48.01(1)(b), (g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4289 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith A. Rudolph
809.23(1)(b)5 (2003-04). [1] The Honorable Dennis P. Moroney imposed and stayed the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25673 - 2006-06-26

State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
that juror number three’s “incomplete answer” demonstrates that juror number three “d[id] not know” if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5300 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher A. Frost
)(b), Stats., and burglary as a repeater contrary to § 943.10(1)(a), Stats. Frost pleaded guilty after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9708 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig A. Sussek
the type of “[a]ntisocial characteristics” or “[c]onduct [d]isorder[s]” which would limit or lessen his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: patrick c. haughney, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6473 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig A. Kvalo
(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. Smith
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] “Attempted second-degree murder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8601 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard A. Strand
that the actuarial instruments showed (1) he was not a sexually violent person, (2) the “[c]linical judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3906 - 2005-03-31