Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11631 - 11640 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11631 - 11640 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we resolve the legal questions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61909 - 2011-03-28
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we resolve the legal questions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61909 - 2011-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
erroneous. Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1910-CR Complete Title...
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2008-04-02
, the application of constitutional principles to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2008-04-02
[PDF]
Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42499 - 2009-10-21
of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42499 - 2009-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. See id. This presents an issue of law for our de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. See id. This presents an issue of law for our de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
State v. Melvin Beasley
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 132, 473 N.W.2d 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8471 - 2014-05-01
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 132, 473 N.W.2d 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8471 - 2014-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Judgment modified and, as modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2005-04-14
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Judgment modified and, as modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32441 - 2005-04-14
[PDF]
Douglas Dahlin, Jr. v. James B. Dahlin
. 2d 286, 292, 441 N.W.2d 335 (Ct. App. 1989), which we decide de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 286, 292, 441 N.W.2d 335 (Ct. App. 1989), which we decide de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cleatus L. Marney, Jr.
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See State v. Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16022 - 2017-09-21
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See State v. Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16022 - 2017-09-21