Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11631 - 11640 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29887 - 2007-08-01

COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18

State v. Nickie C. Brewington
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question which this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18349 - 2005-05-31

Carl Edward Rucker v. Jewel Food Store
, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7180 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 18
de novo. See Hutson v. State of Wis. Pers. Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263 Wis. 2d 612, 665 N.W.2d 212
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34746 - 2009-01-27

2007 WI 21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28172 - 2007-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See City of Brookfield v. Collar, 148 Wis. 2d 839, 841-42, 436 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66199 - 2011-06-21

COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous. Id. Application of constitutional principles to these facts is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110026 - 2007-05-02

State v. Manuel L. Riley
the search meets constitutional standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12797 - 2005-03-31

Steven D. Pederson v. Town Board of the Town of Windsor
would not bear the cost of improving the road present questions of law that we review de novo. Pederson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8378 - 2005-03-31