Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11651 - 11660 of 52769 for address.
Search results 11651 - 11660 of 52769 for address.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that there was overwhelming evidence that he possessed the short-barreled shotgun. We do not address this contention because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27593 - 2006-12-26
that there was overwhelming evidence that he possessed the short-barreled shotgun. We do not address this contention because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27593 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
and fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576041 - 2022-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the court addressed and rejected the same grounds at a June 2010 motion hearing.[2] ¶4 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
the court addressed and rejected the same grounds at a June 2010 motion hearing.[2] ¶4 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
CA Blank Order
report addresses the circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Lulich was sent a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101523 - 2013-08-28
report addresses the circuit court’s exercise of its sentencing discretion. Lulich was sent a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101523 - 2013-08-28
CA Blank Order
of whether a new factor existed. We will not address a contrary argument on appeal. [3] The State argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119163 - 2014-08-06
of whether a new factor existed. We will not address a contrary argument on appeal. [3] The State argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119163 - 2014-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on Paragraph 34 for two reasons. ¶7 First, Roger’s brief-in-chief fails to address Paragraph 35 in arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426700 - 2021-09-16
on Paragraph 34 for two reasons. ¶7 First, Roger’s brief-in-chief fails to address Paragraph 35 in arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426700 - 2021-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 A Machner hearing addresses a defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191283 - 2017-09-21
2 A Machner hearing addresses a defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191283 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the opportunity in his March 2006 pro se motion to raise issues not addressed by his postconviction attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31352 - 2008-01-07
the opportunity in his March 2006 pro se motion to raise issues not addressed by his postconviction attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31352 - 2008-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a “rehash” of arguments previously addressed by both the circuit court and this court and therefore barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
a “rehash” of arguments previously addressed by both the circuit court and this court and therefore barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Smits could seek plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558168 - 2022-08-25
and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Smits could seek plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558168 - 2022-08-25