Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 24443 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. Ezell moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
of extended supervision. Ezell moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the possibility of parole for the homicide and ten years of initial confinement and ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106265 - 2017-09-21
the possibility of parole for the homicide and ten years of initial confinement and ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to eighteen months of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21
to eighteen months of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and twelve years’ extended supervision. No. 2015AP1793-CRNM 3 The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182450 - 2017-09-21
confinement and twelve years’ extended supervision. No. 2015AP1793-CRNM 3 The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182450 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis Gutknecht
this court denied Gutknecht’s motion to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion, he proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3890 - 2005-03-31
this court denied Gutknecht’s motion to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion, he proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3890 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
five days of the hearing, nor moved to extend the time period prior to the hearing. In fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94984 - 2013-04-01
five days of the hearing, nor moved to extend the time period prior to the hearing. In fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94984 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Where, as here, land “‘is granted privileges which are not granted or extended to other land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26911 - 2014-09-15
. Where, as here, land “‘is granted privileges which are not granted or extended to other land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
to the council stated the purpose of the project was “the construction of South Street extended for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25307 - 2017-09-21
to the council stated the purpose of the project was “the construction of South Street extended for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25307 - 2017-09-21