Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 50108 for our.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 50108 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this second statement satisfies all elements of a perjury charge. Therefore, we confine our remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
this second statement satisfies all elements of a perjury charge. Therefore, we confine our remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey E. Marotz v. Arthur E. Hallman, Jr.
correctly characterizes the phrase he cites. But our answer is the same. We agree that Marotz was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20747 - 2005-12-21
correctly characterizes the phrase he cites. But our answer is the same. We agree that Marotz was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20747 - 2005-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and if our review reveals that discretion was properly exercised, we follow “‘a consistent and strong policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82919 - 2012-05-29
, and if our review reveals that discretion was properly exercised, we follow “‘a consistent and strong policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82919 - 2012-05-29
Express Services, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
arguments are based on misinterpretations of the administrative code and our standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5535 - 2005-03-31
arguments are based on misinterpretations of the administrative code and our standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5535 - 2005-03-31
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
in jurisdictional terms, we have sua sponte considered the question in that light as is our duty; we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
in jurisdictional terms, we have sua sponte considered the question in that light as is our duty; we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tyler Dorbritz v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
that there are no contested facts and that this case presents only an issue of law. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18136 - 2017-09-21
that there are no contested facts and that this case presents only an issue of law. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kerby G. Denman
construe a statute, our aim is to ascertain the intent of the legislature, and in doing so we look first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15747 - 2017-09-21
construe a statute, our aim is to ascertain the intent of the legislature, and in doing so we look first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15747 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence to support a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76458 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence to support a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76458 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dennis L. Farr
. We think our statement in Dauer must necessarily be confined to the facts of that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
. We think our statement in Dauer must necessarily be confined to the facts of that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth C. Applegate v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
, 596 N.W.2d 805 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶8 In this case, our standard of review requires us to view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15830 - 2005-03-31
, 596 N.W.2d 805 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶8 In this case, our standard of review requires us to view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15830 - 2005-03-31