Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11891 - 11900 of 63601 for records.
Search results 11891 - 11900 of 63601 for records.
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the restitution order[3] may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the restitution order[3] may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112550 - 2014-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
or resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Darnell Stevens
filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/news/thirdbranch/oct24/judicialsecurity.htm - 2026-03-01
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/news/thirdbranch/oct24/judicialsecurity.htm - 2026-03-01
[PDF]
David Gunderman v. Jack Hartwig
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/news/thirdbranch/nov22/directorsaddress.htm - 2026-03-01
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/news/thirdbranch/nov22/directorsaddress.htm - 2026-03-01
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals Judicial Exchange Program
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/courts/appeals/judexchange.htm - 2026-03-01
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/courts/appeals/judexchange.htm - 2026-03-01