Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 30154 for de.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 30154 for de.
Anita Gartz v. J&J Association Holding, LLC
counterclaim. J&J filed a demand for, and received, a trial de novo in the small claims court. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
counterclaim. J&J filed a demand for, and received, a trial de novo in the small claims court. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court considered all issues de novo and ruled against the party). For these reasons, the trial court’s
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34640 - 2008-11-13
court considered all issues de novo and ruled against the party). For these reasons, the trial court’s
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34640 - 2008-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
of a summary judgment is de novo. Foremost Farms USA Co-op. v. Performance Process, Inc., 2006 WI App 246, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45257 - 2010-02-23
of a summary judgment is de novo. Foremost Farms USA Co-op. v. Performance Process, Inc., 2006 WI App 246, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45257 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
WI App 155
was decided on summary judgment; thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40510 - 2014-09-15
was decided on summary judgment; thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40510 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and application of regulations and statutes present questions of law, generally subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52859 - 2010-08-02
interpretation and application of regulations and statutes present questions of law, generally subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52859 - 2010-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Our review is de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶19 Here, Russell has failed to set forth evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132030 - 2017-09-21
). Our review is de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶19 Here, Russell has failed to set forth evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132030 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
to a public trial. From Milwaukee County. 2007AP45 De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity This case examines
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=80&year=2008
to a public trial. From Milwaukee County. 2007AP45 De La Trinidad v. Capitol Indemnity This case examines
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=80&year=2008
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, based on our de novo consideration of the facts as found by the trial court, we conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207207 - 2018-01-29
, based on our de novo consideration of the facts as found by the trial court, we conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207207 - 2018-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Reversed in part and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628537 - 2023-03-02
County: MARTIN J. DE VRIES, Judge. Reversed in part and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628537 - 2023-03-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the court of appeals, which we granted. II ¶7 We review de novo the circuit court's denial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527465 - 2022-08-05
the court of appeals, which we granted. II ¶7 We review de novo the circuit court's denial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527465 - 2022-08-05