Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12001 - 12010 of 68270 for law.

[PDF] State v. Dennis B. Robinson
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3343 - 2017-09-19

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. John P. Louderman
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against John P. Louderman, III, Attorney at Law. Board of Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17429 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
finds that the agency has erroneously interpreted a provision of law and a correct interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789483 - 2024-04-18

COURT OF APPEALS
on a mistake of law. He also asserts that the circuit court made clearly erroneous findings of fact. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57858 - 2010-12-15

State v. Stanley E. Young
, which do not include a prior warning of what conduct contravenes the law, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31

William J. McKibbin v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. McKibbin appealed the initial determination that he was fired for misconduct. The administrative law judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8552 - 2005-03-31

June Remick v. James D. Cady
, on the cremated remains of the decedent, as a question of law to be reviewed de novo. See Scheideler v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16332 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas M. Maguire
be revoked. He contends that the trial court erred because, as a matter of law, Maguire could not unlawfully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13603 - 2005-03-31

State v. William R.S.
[for termination] under the new law is far easier to establish than the grounds under the old law. Under the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Nierengarten v. State
or modify the agency action if it finds that the agency has erroneously interpreted a provision of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9950 - 2017-09-19