Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12001 - 12010 of 68259 for law.

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Maguire
, as a matter of law, Maguire could not unlawfully refuse this test, since the requesting officers had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13603 - 2017-09-21

State v. Stanley E. Young
, which do not include a prior warning of what conduct contravenes the law, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a situation that if not necessarily needing it (since in our view the law is clear) certainly is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275253 - 2020-08-05

COURT OF APPEALS
on a mistake of law. He also asserts that the circuit court made clearly erroneous findings of fact. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57858 - 2010-12-15

[PDF] State v. Quentin D.
:40 p.m. on a weekday, and school day, afternoon.1 Section 938.19(1)(d)10, STATS., permits a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15450 - 2017-09-21

John F. Maloney v. Port Superior Marina Association Board of Directors
concludes that the issue raised presents a question of law and that ratification by a vote of the membership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
was made to conform with the law. ΒΆ4 Although the Paces begin their Eighth Amendment argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15875 - 2017-09-21

City of Kiel v. Michael T. Roehrig
. Roehrig appeals. DISCUSSION The Law We begin by reviewing the law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12235 - 2005-03-31

Gary Rowland v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
of age. After a hearing on the merits, the administrative law judge dismissed the complaint, and LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14212 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis B. Robinson
was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3343 - 2005-03-31