Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12061 - 12070 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 12061 - 12070 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Judge Flanagan as the trial court. 2 Gayfield filed two postconviction motions before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260817 - 2020-05-19
to Judge Flanagan as the trial court. 2 Gayfield filed two postconviction motions before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260817 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Louis D. Thomas
, but acquitted of the latter charge. Before sentencing, Thomas filed a series of motions challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6510 - 2017-09-19
, but acquitted of the latter charge. Before sentencing, Thomas filed a series of motions challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6510 - 2017-09-19
State v. Louis D. Thomas
of the former charge, but acquitted of the latter charge. Before sentencing, Thomas filed a series of motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6510 - 2005-03-31
of the former charge, but acquitted of the latter charge. Before sentencing, Thomas filed a series of motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and 3 As we will discuss later, the childrens’ interviews were the subject of a prior motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
and 3 As we will discuss later, the childrens’ interviews were the subject of a prior motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and 3 As we will discuss later, the childrens’ interviews were the subject of a prior motion in limine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
and 3 As we will discuss later, the childrens’ interviews were the subject of a prior motion in limine
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980681 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Alejandro Rivera
, we also review the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s ruling on suppression motions, Rivera’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
, we also review the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s ruling on suppression motions, Rivera’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4140 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
when it denied his motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to detain him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
when it denied his motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to detain him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to detain him and, second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53404 - 2010-08-17
motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to detain him and, second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53404 - 2010-08-17
State v. Alejandro Rivera
the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s ruling on suppression motions, Rivera’s mental health evaluations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s ruling on suppression motions, Rivera’s mental health evaluations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4140 - 2005-03-31
William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
and 101.2269, Stats. (1913). 3. The Private Road on said Plat is held in joint ownership by dedication. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24
and 101.2269, Stats. (1913). 3. The Private Road on said Plat is held in joint ownership by dedication. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24