Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12061 - 12070 of 30131 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review.” State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25, ¶8, 260 Wis. 2d 406, 659
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103423 - 2017-09-21

State v. Eric Johnson
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12223 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 197
it to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26528 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
(1) (2007-08)[2] is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47046 - 2010-03-30

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Our review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28421 - 2007-03-13

COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03

2007 WI App 19
and remanded 2006AP001533 City of Eau Claire v. Kenneth R. Van De Hei
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28112 - 2007-03-11

Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5989 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Betty Pichelman v. Arnold Barfknecht
. Our review of summary judgment is de novo, that is, without deference to the circuit court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8689 - 2017-09-19

State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31