Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12081 - 12090 of 16506 for commentating.
Search results 12081 - 12090 of 16506 for commentating.
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1979) (In closing arguments, a “prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
(1979) (In closing arguments, a “prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
lost and two others wounded. It commented that going to shoot up someone’s home in retaliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
lost and two others wounded. It commented that going to shoot up someone’s home in retaliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Walters
and suggestibility “because it invades the province of the jury and is testimony commenting on the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4192 - 2017-09-19
and suggestibility “because it invades the province of the jury and is testimony commenting on the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Further, Keeler had not thought much of A.W.’s comment about getting Lee-Kendrick in trouble—Keeler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192148 - 2017-09-21
. Further, Keeler had not thought much of A.W.’s comment about getting Lee-Kendrick in trouble—Keeler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192148 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a subsequent comment period, asserting the agreement would illegally discriminate against Rockland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56776 - 2014-09-15
a subsequent comment period, asserting the agreement would illegally discriminate against Rockland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56776 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to take place. THE COURT: All right. Any comment on that, Ms. Poulos? MS. POULOS: Yes. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58106 - 2010-12-28
to take place. THE COURT: All right. Any comment on that, Ms. Poulos? MS. POULOS: Yes. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58106 - 2010-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. Neither the parties nor the court commented on the October 22, 2008 withdrawal of the NGI plea before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
. Neither the parties nor the court commented on the October 22, 2008 withdrawal of the NGI plea before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Humphrey
comments in its decision denying the petition, which, the State maintains, “cut[] to the heart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13332 - 2017-09-21
comments in its decision denying the petition, which, the State maintains, “cut[] to the heart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13332 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert P. Hinchey
the investigator’s testimony constituted impermissible comment on the credibility of another witness presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5930 - 2005-03-31
the investigator’s testimony constituted impermissible comment on the credibility of another witness presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5930 - 2005-03-31