Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 67039 for ct.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 67039 for ct.
State v. Richard E. Studt
Harrell v. State, 88 Wis.2d 546, 277 N.W.2d 462 (Ct. App. 1979), and State v. Hirsch, 140 Wis.2d 468, 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12211 - 2005-03-31
Harrell v. State, 88 Wis.2d 546, 277 N.W.2d 462 (Ct. App. 1979), and State v. Hirsch, 140 Wis.2d 468, 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12211 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
. Appeal No. 2005AP254 Cir. Ct. No. 1999CF2189 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20078 - 2005-10-26
. Appeal No. 2005AP254 Cir. Ct. No. 1999CF2189 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20078 - 2005-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2024AP1183 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2024AP1183 Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919421 - 2025-02-25
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
, 534 N.W.2d 634, 638 (Ct. App. 1995). We reject Minniecheske’s arguments and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13474 - 2005-03-31
, 534 N.W.2d 634, 638 (Ct. App. 1995). We reject Minniecheske’s arguments and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13474 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 2010AP1672 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV221 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60752 - 2011-03-07
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 2010AP1672 Cir. Ct. No. 2009CV221 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60752 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, 133 S. Ct. 1059 (2013). There, the Court considered whether, in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1338
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97926 - 2014-09-15
, 133 S. Ct. 1059 (2013). There, the Court considered whether, in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1338
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97926 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Wagers
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP1319-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF34 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18489 - 2017-09-21
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP1319-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF34 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18489 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth G. Gering
.2d 353, 357 (Ct. App. 1990). Absent a clear showing that discretion was erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10201 - 2005-03-31
.2d 353, 357 (Ct. App. 1990). Absent a clear showing that discretion was erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10201 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 2006AP1983 Cir. Ct. No. 2006TR415 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27870 - 2007-01-22
and Rule 809.62. Appeal No. 2006AP1983 Cir. Ct. No. 2006TR415 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27870 - 2007-01-22
State v. George R. Bollig
(Ct. App. 1999-Published) Opinion Filed: February 4, 2000 Submitted on Briefs: Oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17418 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1999-Published) Opinion Filed: February 4, 2000 Submitted on Briefs: Oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17418 - 2005-03-31