Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12101 - 12110 of 72989 for we.

COURT OF APPEALS
a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05

Warren D. Patek v. Peggy A. Stearns
. By order dated March 11, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12122 - 2005-03-31

Edward M. Moran v. Property Management Concepts
the dismissal of three separate small claims actions, which we have consolidated for purposes of this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7405 - 2005-03-31

GreenStone Farm Credit Services v. Robert M. Giesler
an order denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18265 - 2005-05-23

[PDF] James E. Pagel v. Security Health Plan
that the medical treatment at issue was not covered under the contract. We agree with Security and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11335 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willard E. Lott
. Assuming for argument’s sake that counsel was ineffective, we agree with the trial court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14386 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
CURIAM. We review the report of Referee Jonathan V. Goodman, recommending that the court publicly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Archie F. Lange v. Ronald Tumm
highway discontinued. We reverse the judgment because there is a genuine issue of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16309 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to determine the credibility of the evidence produced. We reject each of these claims for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Anthony Larson
and sentence modification without an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that the circuit court properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3695 - 2017-09-19