Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12131 - 12140 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 12131 - 12140 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Hennings claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion for postconviction relief. Hennings claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
Timothy Conant v. Physicians Plus Medical Group, Inc.
dismissing their claims against Physicians Plus Medical Group, Meriter Hospital, and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14787 - 2005-03-31
dismissing their claims against Physicians Plus Medical Group, Meriter Hospital, and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14787 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=596&year=2014
Mental commitments Self representation Probate Small claims Other languages Court of Appeals Office
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=596&year=2014
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023CV434 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II ADVOCATE CLAIM SERVICE, LLC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812846 - 2024-06-12
. No. 2023CV434 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II ADVOCATE CLAIM SERVICE, LLC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812846 - 2024-06-12
Staci J. Schwittay v. Sheboygan Falls Mutual Ins. Co.
for subrogation claims is the statute of limitations on the underlying tort, because the running of that statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3005 - 2005-03-31
for subrogation claims is the statute of limitations on the underlying tort, because the running of that statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3005 - 2005-03-31
National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
) a taxpayer can file a refund claim under § 71.75(5), Stats., within two years of a field audit that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12368 - 2005-03-31
) a taxpayer can file a refund claim under § 71.75(5), Stats., within two years of a field audit that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
appeals an order dismissing its claim for relocation No. 2004AP3266 2 benefits in an eminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order dismissing its claim for relocation No. 2004AP3266 2 benefits in an eminent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
§ 71.88, STATS.; and (2) a taxpayer can file a No. 97-1116 2 refund claim under § 71.75(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12368 - 2017-09-21
§ 71.88, STATS.; and (2) a taxpayer can file a No. 97-1116 2 refund claim under § 71.75(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
an arguable claim for the denial of their procedural rights. He expressly rejected their takings claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
an arguable claim for the denial of their procedural rights. He expressly rejected their takings claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
their claims against Thomas Cotter and his insurer, American Family Insurance Company.[1] The Cebulas assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31
their claims against Thomas Cotter and his insurer, American Family Insurance Company.[1] The Cebulas assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31