Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12141 - 12150 of 41688 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 12141 - 12150 of 41688 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Jones
a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of armed robbery, party to a crime, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12322 - 2017-09-21
a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of armed robbery, party to a crime, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in All Civil Action expectation to a Jury Trial.” She concludes the section of her brief-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
in All Civil Action expectation to a Jury Trial.” She concludes the section of her brief-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
should be granted a new trial because his waiver of the right to a jury trial was not knowing, voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
should be granted a new trial because his waiver of the right to a jury trial was not knowing, voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83712 - 2012-06-19
State v. Mary Krueger
a jury’s verdict, convicting her of first-degree intentional homicide as party to a crime, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
a jury’s verdict, convicting her of first-degree intentional homicide as party to a crime, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should be granted a new trial because his waiver of the right to a jury trial was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83712 - 2014-09-15
should be granted a new trial because his waiver of the right to a jury trial was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83712 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antonio J. Spencer
for failing to object to a six‑person jury, and for failing to object, on confrontational and hearsay grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
for failing to object to a six‑person jury, and for failing to object, on confrontational and hearsay grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also argues that he is entitled to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85157 - 2014-09-15
. He also argues that he is entitled to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85157 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leonard Avery
(hereinafter “Andre”), were both charged with the same crimes and were tried together but had separate juries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9779 - 2017-09-19
(hereinafter “Andre”), were both charged with the same crimes and were tried together but had separate juries
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9779 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian A. Schultz
instructed the jury on conspiracy and burglary, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3329 - 2005-03-31
instructed the jury on conspiracy and burglary, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3329 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian A. Schultz
instructed the jury on conspiracy and burglary, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3328 - 2005-03-31
instructed the jury on conspiracy and burglary, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3328 - 2005-03-31