Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12191 - 12200 of 73032 for we.
Search results 12191 - 12200 of 73032 for we.
[PDF]
State v. Linda M. Graff
basis for the stop based on the officer’s observation that Schaefer was speeding. ¶2 We likewise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
basis for the stop based on the officer’s observation that Schaefer was speeding. ¶2 We likewise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Dorian H.
in waiving jurisdiction. We affirm the orders. Dorian H. argues first that the testimony of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9277 - 2017-09-19
in waiving jurisdiction. We affirm the orders. Dorian H. argues first that the testimony of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9277 - 2017-09-19
State v. Raymond C. Williams
Kathleen on prior occasions and expert testimony regarding domestic violence. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12168 - 2005-03-31
Kathleen on prior occasions and expert testimony regarding domestic violence. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12168 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Brian T.
Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fecke
conviction should be reversed in the interest of justice. We reject each of Fecke’s claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
conviction should be reversed in the interest of justice. We reject each of Fecke’s claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this disciplinary proceeding, we review a stipulation pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115777 - 2014-06-30
license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this disciplinary proceeding, we review a stipulation pursuant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115777 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Sheets
., permits a trial court to order installation on only one vehicle owned by a convicted defendant. We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8853 - 2017-09-19
., permits a trial court to order installation on only one vehicle owned by a convicted defendant. We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8853 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the grant of summary judgment as well as rulings on multiple motions. For the reasons that follow, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
the grant of summary judgment as well as rulings on multiple motions. For the reasons that follow, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985829 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We disagree with the State’s interpretation of the trial court’s decision. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93293 - 2014-09-15
. We disagree with the State’s interpretation of the trial court’s decision. Although the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93293 - 2014-09-15