Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 29957 for de.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 29957 for de.
Patricia Moran v. Milwaukee County
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7380 - 2005-03-31
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7380 - 2005-03-31
Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
. The determination of the applicable legal standard and the interpretation of that standard are subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15439 - 2005-03-31
. The determination of the applicable legal standard and the interpretation of that standard are subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Butte Des Morts Country Club, Inc. v. City of Appleton
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III BUTTE DES MORTS COUNTRY CLUB, INC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13291 - 2017-09-21
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III BUTTE DES MORTS COUNTRY CLUB, INC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13291 - 2017-09-21
Village of Elm Grove v. Michael R. Johnson
with an appeal to the circuit court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 800.14. Because he did not request a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6081 - 2005-03-31
with an appeal to the circuit court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 800.14. Because he did not request a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6081 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Munson
jeopardy. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ellen C. (Hawes) Grendahl v. United Fire & Casualty Company
not consider the effect of this label because we review the trial court’s summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11656 - 2017-09-19
not consider the effect of this label because we review the trial court’s summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11656 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Beloit v. Mieke Veneman
does not challenge the propriety of using the summary judgment procedure when a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3430 - 2017-09-19
does not challenge the propriety of using the summary judgment procedure when a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3430 - 2017-09-19
WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1335 Complete Title o...
whether WEA Property was entitled to summary judgment under a de novo standard of review.[3] We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103910 - 2013-12-17
whether WEA Property was entitled to summary judgment under a de novo standard of review.[3] We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103910 - 2013-12-17
Ellen C. (Hawes) Grendahl v. United Fire & Casualty Company
court’s summary judgment de novo. Though both parties moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11656 - 2005-03-31
court’s summary judgment de novo. Though both parties moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Plains. ¶2 After taking evidence at a de novo trial, the circuit court: entered judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93183 - 2014-09-15
Plains. ¶2 After taking evidence at a de novo trial, the circuit court: entered judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93183 - 2014-09-15