Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1221 - 1230 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] Gary Regge v. Sunset Memory Gardens
court, and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Gersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wood County v. Gregory L. Swank
. 2d 408, 417, 280 N.W.2d 142 (1979). We review questions of law de novo. First Nat’l Leasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5980 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Michael S. Johnson v. Gerald Berge
. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Dykman, Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5116 - 2017-09-19

Wood County v. Gregory L. Swank
-Erie Co. v. DIHLR, 90 Wis. 2d 408, 417, 280 N.W.2d 142 (1979). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5980 - 2005-03-31

Patricia Moran v. Milwaukee County
review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7380 - 2005-03-31

Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
. The determination of the applicable legal standard and the interpretation of that standard are subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15439 - 2005-03-31

Village of Elm Grove v. Michael R. Johnson
with an appeal to the circuit court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 800.14. Because he did not request a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6081 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard L. Munson
jeopardy. We review a claim of multiplicity de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ellen C. (Hawes) Grendahl v. United Fire & Casualty Company
not consider the effect of this label because we review the trial court’s summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11656 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Beloit v. Mieke Veneman
does not challenge the propriety of using the summary judgment procedure when a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3430 - 2017-09-19