Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12211 - 12220 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 12211 - 12220 of 16451 for commenting.
State v. James A. H.
marijuana. In response to a comment by James that he had only been given “a little bit of marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31
marijuana. In response to a comment by James that he had only been given “a little bit of marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jose S. Soto
litigation may provide that information supplied to a lawyer may not be disclosed to the client.” Comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6784 - 2017-09-20
litigation may provide that information supplied to a lawyer may not be disclosed to the client.” Comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6784 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
.” The trial court responded: “All right. It’s preserved.” Winston’s counsel did not offer any comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
State v. Jerry J. Wintlend
). As one commentator noted, “[i]t would be paradoxical indeed for individuals to claim that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
). As one commentator noted, “[i]t would be paradoxical indeed for individuals to claim that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
comments to Reifenberg were ambiguous, that creates a material factual dispute because other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
comments to Reifenberg were ambiguous, that creates a material factual dispute because other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
and a criminal trial. In its opening statement, the State commented: “I am going to remind you again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstance” based on an unidentified recruiter’s comments, which he conceded contained “no specifics.” ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35766 - 2009-03-10
circumstance” based on an unidentified recruiter’s comments, which he conceded contained “no specifics.” ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35766 - 2009-03-10
State v. Robert K.
granted within the applicable time limits. The following comment from Quinsanna applies equally here: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
granted within the applicable time limits. The following comment from Quinsanna applies equally here: [T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roosevelt Williams
commented that the police "did not" observe any "unusual or suspicious conduct." Id. at 80. In the instant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11024 - 2005-03-31
commented that the police "did not" observe any "unusual or suspicious conduct." Id. at 80. In the instant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11024 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brad S. Miller
plea. …. [Miller’s counsel]: And in regards to [the State’s] comment, I guess I was just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17812 - 2005-07-06
plea. …. [Miller’s counsel]: And in regards to [the State’s] comment, I guess I was just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17812 - 2005-07-06