Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12261 - 12270 of 17643 for ex.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 28, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
; see also State ex rel. Tate v. Schwarz, 2002 WI 127, ¶20, 257 Wis. 2d 40, 654 N.W.2d 438 (recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107311 - 2014-01-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and appellate counsel are often the same person, their functions differ. See State ex rel. Smalley v. Morgan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88603 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
-19, 257 Wis. 2d 579, 652 N.W.2d 393; State ex rel. Washington v. Schwarz, 2000 WI App 235, ¶¶1, 6 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37049 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
in assessing the evidence. See State ex rel. Cholka v. Johnson, 96 Wis. 2d 704, 713, 292 N.W.2d 835 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46758 - 2014-09-15

State v. Khounmy Lanoi
concerning a defendant’s pre-Miranda silence. See U.S. ex rel. Savory v. Lane, 832 F.2d 1011, 1017-1018 (7th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12278 - 2005-03-31

Theresa Huml v. Robert W. Vlazny
of the provisions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, ¶¶46-48, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19582 - 2005-09-13

[PDF] State v. Eric Pittman
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact.” State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15

State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
Saldana appears pro se, we chose to address the merits. See State ex rel. Harris v. Smith, 220 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2893 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elizabeth Mata
there is no negotiated plea. State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d 615, 645-46, 579 N.W.2d 698 (1998). However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3142 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patrick Greer
is a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis.2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d 362, 368
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12385 - 2005-03-31