Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12331 - 12340 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12331 - 12340 of 30123 for de.
State v. Scott R. Weber
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Id. at 601 (citation omitted). The sufficiency of a petition is an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108947 - 2014-03-11
.’” Id. at 601 (citation omitted). The sufficiency of a petition is an issue of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108947 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792288 - 2024-04-24
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792288 - 2024-04-24
[PDF]
State v. Boyd W. Pigman
findings were clearly erroneous, this appeal presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4360 - 2017-09-19
findings were clearly erroneous, this appeal presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4360 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank Machado
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo." Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo." Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation of a statute is an issue we review de novo. Waukesha Cnty. v. Steven H., 2000 WI 28, ¶16, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93259 - 2014-09-15
. Interpretation of a statute is an issue we review de novo. Waukesha Cnty. v. Steven H., 2000 WI 28, ¶16, 233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93259 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
5 constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28421 - 2014-09-15
5 constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28421 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is available to Key is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “Writ of habeas corpus is an equitable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238014 - 2019-03-27
is available to Key is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “Writ of habeas corpus is an equitable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238014 - 2019-03-27
State v. Anthony A. Kasparec
is de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 712, 345 N.W.2d 457, 463 (1984). The record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 712, 345 N.W.2d 457, 463 (1984). The record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9299 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell Stokes
determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial is reviewed de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial is reviewed de novo. Id. at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31