Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12471 - 12480 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12471 - 12480 of 40029 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Rubin E. Ards
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
State v. James D.S.
and Wydeven as witnesses to the victim’s statements. James D.S. objected to that testimony as hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10969 - 2014-01-22
and Wydeven as witnesses to the victim’s statements. James D.S. objected to that testimony as hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10969 - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of witnesses, and by admitting statements he made without receiving the requisite Miranda2 warnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17
of witnesses, and by admitting statements he made without receiving the requisite Miranda2 warnings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
statement under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. See Wis. Stat. § 908.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31944 - 2008-02-27
statement under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. See Wis. Stat. § 908.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31944 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to her statements to police that Brown was the shooter, Powell said that she was “scared” at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611485 - 2023-01-18
to her statements to police that Brown was the shooter, Powell said that she was “scared” at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611485 - 2023-01-18
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
motion to suppress his first statement to police; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress his first statement to police; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
claims: (1) the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress his first statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3586 - 2017-09-19
claims: (1) the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress his first statement to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3586 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. See WIS. STAT. § 908.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31944 - 2014-09-15
statement under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. See WIS. STAT. § 908.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thermond Larry III
warrant obtained with an affidavit he asserts No. 97-2624-CR 2 contained a false statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12992 - 2017-09-21
warrant obtained with an affidavit he asserts No. 97-2624-CR 2 contained a false statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12992 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31