Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
NOTICE
them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost the Kuwabaras to make the home code compliant as set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52581 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
that the court impose the costs of this proceeding. Subsequently, the referee twice amended her report, first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137812 - 2017-09-21
that the court impose the costs of this proceeding. Subsequently, the referee twice amended her report, first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137812 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Stingley’s failure to pay the attorney’s fees and costs imposed following determinations that Stingley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772289 - 2024-03-05
for Stingley’s failure to pay the attorney’s fees and costs imposed following determinations that Stingley
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772289 - 2024-03-05
Frontsheet
, and recommending that the court impose the costs of this proceeding. Subsequently, the referee twice amended her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137812 - 2015-03-17
, and recommending that the court impose the costs of this proceeding. Subsequently, the referee twice amended her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137812 - 2015-03-17
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Peterson
in the amount of $26,237, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The OLR filed a statement of costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25073 - 2006-05-04
in the amount of $26,237, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The OLR filed a statement of costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25073 - 2006-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
(the Kuwabaras). The Burds appeal from a judgment obligating them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-11-20
(the Kuwabaras). The Burds appeal from a judgment obligating them to pay the Kuwabaras the amount it cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate comparable sales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65485 - 2011-06-08
approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate comparable sales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65485 - 2011-06-08
Bruce E. Larson v. Sandoval Dental Care
.” The trial court awarded frivolous-action fees of $120 in addition to the statutory costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10765 - 2005-03-31
.” The trial court awarded frivolous-action fees of $120 in addition to the statutory costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the sales comparison approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
: the sales comparison approach, the cost approach, and the income approach.” Id., ¶7 n.2. If adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65485 - 2014-09-15
Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
court’s award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31
court’s award of costs to Thomas. We deem this issue waived. We affirm the order. FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31