Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 63608 for records/1000.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 63608 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Shaw
court). In so doing, the trial court may rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
court). In so doing, the trial court may rely in part on the record of the first sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Robinson could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131858 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Robinson could raise on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131858 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court concludes that the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court concludes that the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138598 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09
809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Steven Warner
improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether the presiding judge should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7953 - 2017-09-19
improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether the presiding judge should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7953 - 2017-09-19
State v. Darrell T. Dalton
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141619 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141619 - 2017-09-21