Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is our second opinion in this case involving David Schauer’s claims against the defendants, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32751 - 2008-05-19
. This is our second opinion in this case involving David Schauer’s claims against the defendants, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32751 - 2008-05-19
Anita Gartz v. J&J Association Holding, LLC
§ ATCP 134.06(2)(a) based upon her claim that J&J did not timely return her security deposit within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
§ ATCP 134.06(2)(a) based upon her claim that J&J did not timely return her security deposit within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of appellate counsel claims in the circuit court and for not filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
of appellate counsel claims in the circuit court and for not filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
CA Blank Order
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
to raise these claims as part of his direct appeal, they are procedurally barred. We affirm. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
State v. Eric P. Russell
his postconviction motions. Russell claims: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
his postconviction motions. Russell claims: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8409 - 2005-03-31
James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
possession claim; and (3) the trial court failed to address the issue of privity. Because the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rehabilitation efforts did not constitute new factors, and that Moore’s due process claims were barred by State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341367 - 2021-03-02
rehabilitation efforts did not constitute new factors, and that Moore’s due process claims were barred by State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341367 - 2021-03-02
State v. Jean H.
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. On appeal, this court rejected all of Fondren’s claims on their merits, and also explained why the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29346 - 2014-09-15
. On appeal, this court rejected all of Fondren’s claims on their merits, and also explained why the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29346 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. At a nonevidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the bulk of Earl’s motion from the bench,[2] including his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-02
. At a nonevidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the bulk of Earl’s motion from the bench,[2] including his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120414 - 2014-09-02