Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12551 - 12560 of 83431 for simple case search.

[PDF] Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
in this case is controlled by VanLaarhoven. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 343.305, Marcelle is deemed to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20

Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
obtained the sample pursuant to a search warrant, and Smith does not challenge the probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18681 - 2005-06-22

[PDF] NOTICE
under the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). “[A] prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30604 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
is a form of seizure triggering Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27979 - 2007-01-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
placing Medd under arrest, a search of Medd’s vehicle found five empty sixteen- ounce cans of Mike’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140767 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
.2d 37 (Ct. App. 1991). When reviewing findings of fact, we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31243 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Buren F. Sprague
extraction of a blood sample is a reasonable search by Fourth Amendment standards. See State v. Krause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13009 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Tommy Smith, Jr. v. Daren Swenson
relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06. Therefore, Smith’s petition was filed in both case No. 2004CV3777
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18681 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert M. Lewis
particularized and objective justification.” Id. at 554. This law governs the facts in this case and commands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14960 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unconscionability that is analyzed on a case-by-case basis.” Id., ¶33. “A contract is unconscionable when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213968 - 2018-06-13