Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12571 - 12580 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Gemma L. Kitzman
to the police department where she would be requested to perform additional sobriety tests to confirm his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10771 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Michael C. Cull
privileges for three years based upon his refusal to take a breath test. See § 343.305(10)(b)(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph P. Racicot
tests and after arrest. Racicot claims the arresting officer exceeded the scope of the traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12337 - 2005-03-31

County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
, both as first offenses. He moved to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph P. Racicot
to suppress evidence gathered during field sobriety tests and after arrest. Racicot claims the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12337 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
of admissibility of the breath test result due to a violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.305, the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28031 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
noted. No. 01-0595 2 results of a blood alcohol test. The circuit court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
(OWI), second offense. The State lost the statutory presumption of admissibility of the breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28031 - 2007-02-06

[PDF] State v. Bruce A. Pickens
sobriety tests: the horizontal gaze nystagmus [HGN], the walk and turn test, the one-leg stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13307 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Racine v. Ariel A. Lenz
of admissibility of the Intoxilyzer 5000 test results at trial. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16015 - 2017-09-21