Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12591 - 12600 of 40198 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 12591 - 12600 of 40198 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Eugene Huntington
statements Jeri E. made two weeks after the last incident; (2) an expert improperly expressed an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10999 - 2005-03-31
statements Jeri E. made two weeks after the last incident; (2) an expert improperly expressed an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10999 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
statements to police. We reject Lynch’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
statements to police. We reject Lynch’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
State v. Rubin E. Ards
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
State v. David W. Hoppe
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
State v. Travis Allen
it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18461 - 2005-06-06
State v. Wa Thao Lor
of the victim's before-court and in-court statements and Lor's pretrial statement given to the police. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
of the victim's before-court and in-court statements and Lor's pretrial statement given to the police. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wa Thao Lor
them to express an opinion as to the truthfulness of the victim's before-court and in-court statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10555 - 2017-09-20
them to express an opinion as to the truthfulness of the victim's before-court and in-court statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10555 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Travis Allen
when it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
when it admitted an incriminating custodial statement. Allen argues that he did not understand his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18461 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. Bintz
a written statement from Swendby 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3350 - 2017-09-19
a written statement from Swendby 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3350 - 2017-09-19
State v. David A. Bintz
Haglund took a written statement from Swendby containing information about Bintz’s sleep talk as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31
Haglund took a written statement from Swendby containing information about Bintz’s sleep talk as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3350 - 2005-03-31