Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 30123 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93172 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of Hartland, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Chenequa Land Conservancy, Inc. v. Village of Hartland, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
we review de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78157 - 2012-02-22
violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78157 - 2012-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the question de novo. See Weinberger v. Bowen, 2000 WI App 264, ¶7, 240 Wis. 2d 55, 622 N.W.2d 471. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95080 - 2013-04-08
the question de novo. See Weinberger v. Bowen, 2000 WI App 264, ¶7, 240 Wis. 2d 55, 622 N.W.2d 471. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95080 - 2013-04-08
Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
the evidence at trial. We decline to depart from this rule to decide de novo whether the parties’ contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31
the evidence at trial. We decline to depart from this rule to decide de novo whether the parties’ contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to facts that are not disputed.[3] This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17
to facts that are not disputed.[3] This is a question of law, which we review de novo. Williams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d at 168. We review the constitutionality of a condition of extended supervision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49006 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d at 168. We review the constitutionality of a condition of extended supervision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49006 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Barbara Kloostra v. Travelers Insurance Company
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476 (1980). We note only that our review of the grant is de novo. Green Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8801 - 2017-09-19
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476 (1980). We note only that our review of the grant is de novo. Green Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8801 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51363 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51363 - 2014-09-15