Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 12601 - 12610 of 63986 for records/1000.
Brandon Hill v. Patricia A. Butler
court’s findings of fact, we affirm. ¶2 The only portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6362 - 2005-03-31
court’s findings of fact, we affirm. ¶2 The only portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
being charged – they come after me with the past record. THE COURT: You have no past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10843 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan Falls v. James B. Hodgell
of the record that are before us. See Jocius v. Jocius, 218 Wis. 2d 103, 119, 580 N.W.2d 708 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25347 - 2017-09-21
of the record that are before us. See Jocius v. Jocius, 218 Wis. 2d 103, 119, 580 N.W.2d 708 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25347 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99903 - 2014-09-15
disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99903 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and Hastings’s response, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
of the no-merit report and Hastings’s response, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and Hastings’s response, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
of the no-merit report and Hastings’s response, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
clear after further examination of Grant’s briefs and a review of the record that Grant’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-03
clear after further examination of Grant’s briefs and a review of the record that Grant’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120947 - 2014-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. After review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251882 - 2019-12-26
that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. After review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251882 - 2019-12-26