Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 58455 for speedy trial.
Search results 12641 - 12650 of 58455 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
terminating his parental rights to Marquette S. on the grounds that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
terminating his parental rights to Marquette S. on the grounds that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
Elmer W. Glaeske v. Elwyn M. Shaw
upholding the validity of a trust. He claims the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4595 - 2005-03-31
upholding the validity of a trust. He claims the trial court erred when it: (1) dismissed his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4595 - 2005-03-31
Linda Margaret Salveson v. Douglas County
evidence to support the jury’s finding that Salveson lost a portion of her earning capacity; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15360 - 2005-03-31
evidence to support the jury’s finding that Salveson lost a portion of her earning capacity; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order terminating his parental rights to Marquette S. on the grounds that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35626 - 2014-09-15
an order terminating his parental rights to Marquette S. on the grounds that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35626 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Linda Margaret Salveson v. Douglas County
finding that Salveson lost a portion of her earning capacity; (2) the trial court erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15360 - 2017-09-21
finding that Salveson lost a portion of her earning capacity; (2) the trial court erred by awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15360 - 2017-09-21
State v. James C. Koepp
problems; (2) he received an improper sentence because of those mental health problems; and (3) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11833 - 2005-03-31
problems; (2) he received an improper sentence because of those mental health problems; and (3) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11833 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.[1] The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly harsh sentence, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35637 - 2009-02-23
motion.[1] The issues are whether the trial court imposed an unduly harsh sentence, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35637 - 2009-02-23
State v. Robert J. Stynes
argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to disqualify itself pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to disqualify itself pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
State v. Elliott D. Ray
his jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide, party to a crime, two counts of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5074 - 2005-03-31
his jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide, party to a crime, two counts of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio McAfee
-degree intentional homicide while armed. He challenges the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15214 - 2017-09-21
-degree intentional homicide while armed. He challenges the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15214 - 2017-09-21