Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 68977 for did.
Search results 12721 - 12730 of 68977 for did.
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
that the prosecutor did not breach the agreement and therefore did not address counsel's alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor did not breach the agreement and therefore did not address counsel's alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Stumpner had ample opportunity to object on that ground at the hearing, but did not. Furthermore, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
. Stumpner had ample opportunity to object on that ground at the hearing, but did not. Furthermore, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that program eligibility was a direct consequence of his plea and that his plea was not valid because he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120029 - 2014-08-19
that program eligibility was a direct consequence of his plea and that his plea was not valid because he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120029 - 2014-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the list and confirmed at the November 5 review hearing, many of the therapists either did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291745 - 2020-09-29
on the list and confirmed at the November 5 review hearing, many of the therapists either did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291745 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions were, but did not ask Ward the same question: [REESE’S COUNSEL]: By the way, the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565645 - 2022-09-13
convictions were, but did not ask Ward the same question: [REESE’S COUNSEL]: By the way, the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565645 - 2022-09-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
action because, inter alia, McQuay did not file the petition within the 45-day limitation period under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1101646 - 2026-04-08
action because, inter alia, McQuay did not file the petition within the 45-day limitation period under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1101646 - 2026-04-08
CA Blank Order
to the court in lieu of Dillon’s appearance. The stipulation did not address the probationary dispositions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
to the court in lieu of Dillon’s appearance. The stipulation did not address the probationary dispositions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
credibility finding after an evidentiary hearing at which Buchholz admitted that the primary reason he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38148 - 2009-07-22
credibility finding after an evidentiary hearing at which Buchholz admitted that the primary reason he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38148 - 2009-07-22
Olsten Corporation v. Patricia G. Hass
, in derogation of her contract, Hass changed the name under which she did business to "Olympic." She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8694 - 2005-03-31
, in derogation of her contract, Hass changed the name under which she did business to "Olympic." She also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Teri S. Clarkson v. Dale E. Clarkson
(1)(b)4. No. 04-2078 4 ¶8 In this case the court did not make the necessary findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7610 - 2017-09-19
(1)(b)4. No. 04-2078 4 ¶8 In this case the court did not make the necessary findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7610 - 2017-09-19