Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12741 - 12750 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 12741 - 12750 of 58507 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. William E. Marberry
(1999). Finally, Marberry claims that the trial court erred by applying the wrong standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
(1999). Finally, Marberry claims that the trial court erred by applying the wrong standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Brunet
of his prior battery convictions. However, we uphold the trial court's finding that defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10518 - 2017-09-20
of his prior battery convictions. However, we uphold the trial court's finding that defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10518 - 2017-09-20
96-CV-1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial on the basis of two alleged errors committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2544 - 2005-03-31
” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial on the basis of two alleged errors committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dale Vogel v. Grant-Lafayette Electric Cooperative
) for damage to their dairy herd caused by stray electrical voltage. GLEC claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7819 - 2017-09-19
) for damage to their dairy herd caused by stray electrical voltage. GLEC claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7819 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 78
) and denied Mayo's postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 In his petition for review, Mayo asks
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29486 - 2014-09-15
) and denied Mayo's postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 In his petition for review, Mayo asks
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29486 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 In his petition for review, Mayo asks this court to determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29486 - 2007-06-25
postconviction motion for a new trial. ¶2 In his petition for review, Mayo asks this court to determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29486 - 2007-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see Wis. Stat. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
. Stat. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see Wis. Stat. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see WIS. STAT. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113463 - 2017-09-21
. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see WIS. STAT. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113463 - 2017-09-21
State v. George Smith
him of “child enticement,” see § 948.07(1), Stats., and from the trial court's order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8233 - 2005-03-31
him of “child enticement,” see § 948.07(1), Stats., and from the trial court's order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15