Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 58508 for speedy trial.
State v. John R. Maloney
further argues that the trial court erred by (1) admitting the deceased’s statements to her psychiatrist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31
further argues that the trial court erred by (1) admitting the deceased’s statements to her psychiatrist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 27
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31587 - 2014-09-15
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. George Smith
,” see § 948.07(1), STATS., and from the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8233 - 2017-09-19
,” see § 948.07(1), STATS., and from the trial court's order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8233 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rock K. Ingram
challenges to his conviction for fleeing a traffic officer. He maintains that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9882 - 2017-09-19
challenges to his conviction for fleeing a traffic officer. He maintains that the trial court should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9882 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
State v. David E. Walker
denying his motion for postconviction relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15504 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15504 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
sentence of ten years) on the grounds that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30876 - 2007-12-18
sentence of ten years) on the grounds that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30876 - 2007-12-18
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David E. Walker
relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the complaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15504 - 2017-09-21
relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the complaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15504 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 181
Demmerly, created an actual conflict of interest.2 He contends that the trial court had an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26175 - 2014-09-15
Demmerly, created an actual conflict of interest.2 He contends that the trial court had an obligation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26175 - 2014-09-15