Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 12751 - 12760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see WIS. STAT. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113463 - 2017-09-21
. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see WIS. STAT. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113463 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see Wis. Stat. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
. Stat. § 940.01(1)(a), as party to a crime, see Wis. Stat. § 939.05. He also appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
State v. George Smith
him of “child enticement,” see § 948.07(1), Stats., and from the trial court's order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8233 - 2005-03-31
him of “child enticement,” see § 948.07(1), Stats., and from the trial court's order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8233 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Maloney
further argues that the trial court erred by (1) admitting the deceased’s statements to her psychiatrist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31
further argues that the trial court erred by (1) admitting the deceased’s statements to her psychiatrist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 27
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31587 - 2014-09-15
fees. Sheedy asserts the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof; Maynard Steel Casting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31587 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
sentence of ten years) on the grounds that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30876 - 2007-12-18
sentence of ten years) on the grounds that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30876 - 2007-12-18
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, from a final decision and order of the trial court affirming the final decision and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David E. Walker
relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the complaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15504 - 2017-09-21
relief on three grounds. He contends the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the complaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15504 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to explain why the ultimate sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 271
that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine in addition to the prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court gave no explanation for imposition of the fine in addition to the prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30876 - 2014-09-15