Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12791 - 12800 of 58547 for speedy trial.

Torger Mikkelson v. Trempealeau Marina Inc.
to support the award based on contract, the evidence supports the trial court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15868 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie E. Harris
and 939.05 (2001-02).[1] Harris filed a postconviction motion seeking a new trial, arguing that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21064 - 2006-01-30

State v. Daniel J. Luedke
, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. The trial court denied the motion. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3010 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
(BEK). Kalan claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law in dismissing his legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michael E. Keyes v. Precision Machine & Manufacturing, Inc.
with Forge Flite, Inc. The trial court held Precision liable on those claims upon concluding that Forge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2922 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Amanda L. Gear
felony counts. The issue is whether the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6275 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Colin N. Gelford
contact with a child. He argues that he established a manifest injustice by showing that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14072 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Lopez argues that the trial court’s finding of probable cause to arrest Lopez was primarily deduced from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74247 - 2011-11-22

David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
, Ehrlich and Kaminske (BEK). Kalan claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law in dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14372 - 2005-03-31

State v. Clinton N. Mansker
and to reduce the 320-year sentence. Mansker argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12052 - 2005-03-31