Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 58778 for dos.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 58778 for dos.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have raised during a prior appeal, but failed to do so, and offers no valid reason to excuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987038 - 2025-07-22
have raised during a prior appeal, but failed to do so, and offers no valid reason to excuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987038 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reason for doing so in violation of Batson.2 The State concedes that striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958215 - 2025-05-21
reason for doing so in violation of Batson.2 The State concedes that striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958215 - 2025-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasons, I am going to do the following.” The court then pronounced Pokey’s sentence, which included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100621 - 2017-09-21
reasons, I am going to do the following.” The court then pronounced Pokey’s sentence, which included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100621 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justin David Schwartz
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
Parise previously told Parise, a couple of months prior, that the attorney was no longer “doing family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95747 - 2013-04-17
Parise previously told Parise, a couple of months prior, that the attorney was no longer “doing family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95747 - 2013-04-17
State v. Douglas D. Schoepp
it provide that discovery is not available prior to refusal hearings.[6] Because the statutes do not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9524 - 2005-03-31
it provide that discovery is not available prior to refusal hearings.[6] Because the statutes do not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9524 - 2005-03-31
John D. Puchner v. Anne C. Hepperla
and do not reach the merits of the appeal. In the absence of an acceptable brief, the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14580 - 2005-03-31
and do not reach the merits of the appeal. In the absence of an acceptable brief, the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14580 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
surgeon. The form asked him: Given the above information, do you believe that Robyn Van Laanen’s work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30560 - 2014-09-15
surgeon. The form asked him: Given the above information, do you believe that Robyn Van Laanen’s work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Rice
, the trial court stated: “[W]hat the Court’s going to do is impose on Counts 1 and 2 sentences of 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6423 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court stated: “[W]hat the Court’s going to do is impose on Counts 1 and 2 sentences of 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6423 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carsen Halverson v. A. J. Halverson
on the date of the injury and was unaware of the use of his property on that specific day. We do not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8879 - 2017-09-19
on the date of the injury and was unaware of the use of his property on that specific day. We do not agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8879 - 2017-09-19