Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12991 - 13000 of 73032 for we.
Search results 12991 - 13000 of 73032 for we.
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
did not establish a “fair and just reason” to withdraw his pleas. We reject the arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
did not establish a “fair and just reason” to withdraw his pleas. We reject the arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a judgment divorcing her from Russell Ferg. Russell Ferg cross-appeals. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27296 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a judgment divorcing her from Russell Ferg. Russell Ferg cross-appeals. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Schiller’s arguments and affirm. Background ¶2 The following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25
. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Schiller’s arguments and affirm. Background ¶2 The following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle him to such a hearing. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136507 - 2015-03-04
to entitle him to such a hearing. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136507 - 2015-03-04
Jesus Lopez v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
behavior despite Lopez’s complaints. We conclude that LIRC’s decision was reasonable and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3516 - 2005-03-31
behavior despite Lopez’s complaints. We conclude that LIRC’s decision was reasonable and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
asking McDonald to take a preliminary breath test (PBT). We conclude that the deputy reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56842 - 2014-09-15
asking McDonald to take a preliminary breath test (PBT). We conclude that the deputy reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. 1 BACKGROUND ¶2 Fierro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136507 - 2017-09-21
. We agree. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. 1 BACKGROUND ¶2 Fierro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Beck
. We reject his claims of error and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On January 6, 2001, Beck shot and killed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
. We reject his claims of error and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On January 6, 2001, Beck shot and killed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alfonso Taylor
to convict, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 24, 2000, Jonathon Booth, Taylor’s cousin, was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
to convict, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 24, 2000, Jonathon Booth, Taylor’s cousin, was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
State v. William P. Haessly
on a defective verdict. Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment and order, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
on a defective verdict. Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment and order, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31