Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 131 - 140 of 20060 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 131 - 140 of 20060 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
[PDF]
WI 103
warrants a public reprimand. ¶3 Attorney Nussberger was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1983
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44259 - 2014-09-15
warrants a public reprimand. ¶3 Attorney Nussberger was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1983
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44259 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
in Wisconsin in 1983 and practices in Ladysmith. On March 29, 2003, Attorney Nussberger received a public
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44259 - 2009-12-03
in Wisconsin in 1983 and practices in Ladysmith. On March 29, 2003, Attorney Nussberger received a public
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44259 - 2009-12-03
Gloria A. v. State
, the person filing the notice of intent to appeal "shall file a notice of appeal and docketing statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8590 - 2005-03-31
, the person filing the notice of intent to appeal "shall file a notice of appeal and docketing statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 34
The DHS also challenges Schott’s reliance on J.K. ex rel. R.K. v. Dillenberg, 836 F. Supp. 694 (D. Ariz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114410 - 2026-07-15
The DHS also challenges Schott’s reliance on J.K. ex rel. R.K. v. Dillenberg, 836 F. Supp. 694 (D. Ariz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114410 - 2026-07-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark A. Phillips
in the amount of $148,511.37, which was docketed in January 2001. Attorney Phillips has made no payments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25140 - 2006-05-11
in the amount of $148,511.37, which was docketed in January 2001. Attorney Phillips has made no payments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25140 - 2006-05-11
Brown County v. Shannon R.
and finally were consolidated by assignment to a third judge because of docket congestion. Assignment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
and finally were consolidated by assignment to a third judge because of docket congestion. Assignment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20457 - 2005-11-29
[PDF]
Gloria A. v. State
of the transcripts, the person filing the notice of intent to appeal "shall file a notice of appeal and docketing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8590 - 2017-09-19
of the transcripts, the person filing the notice of intent to appeal "shall file a notice of appeal and docketing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8590 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
opportunities Request training Pretrial Program Commercial Docket Pilot Project Interpreter program Trust
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=307&year=2011
opportunities Request training Pretrial Program Commercial Docket Pilot Project Interpreter program Trust
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=307&year=2011
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
opportunities Request training Pretrial Program Commercial Docket Pilot Project Interpreter program Trust
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1029&year=2018
opportunities Request training Pretrial Program Commercial Docket Pilot Project Interpreter program Trust
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1029&year=2018
[PDF]
Cascade Mountain, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation
principal claims. If the dismissal of those claims was affirmed, Cascade could docket the $20,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11381 - 2017-09-19
principal claims. If the dismissal of those claims was affirmed, Cascade could docket the $20,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11381 - 2017-09-19