Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
—are irrelevant based on our conclusion regarding the issue of burden of proof. See Maryland Arms Ltd. P’ship v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that trial counsel performed ineffectively. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), and our supreme court’s decision in State v. Brown, 2020 WI 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27

[PDF] State v. David L. Shaw
Wis. Act 225, § 519. The changes do not affect our analysis. 3 The State suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10507 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kendell G.
lifted the stay on the placement. ¶14 We find support for our holding in S.D.R. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it moved for and was granted a directed verdict. Our review of the record reveals that while instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70135 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 149
, our analysis is de novo. See ibid. Unless a statute is ambiguous, we apply it as it stands. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
Our response is as follows: First, anonymous or not, the tipster’s information was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35777 - 2009-03-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
—CIVIL 7050. As relevant to our review, a person is dangerous within the meaning of § 51.20(1)(a)2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161304 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Mudge, 229 Wis. 2d 44, 49, 599 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1999). Additionally, our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52098 - 2010-07-14