Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13101 - 13110 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 13101 - 13110 of 58510 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied a fair trial because of certain security measures ordered by the circuit court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
was denied a fair trial because of certain security measures ordered by the circuit court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
State of Arizona v. Brian L. Nowak
proceeding.[1] Nowak raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
proceeding.[1] Nowak raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of evidence, Harris moved to dismiss counts one, two, and twelve. The trial court granted Harris’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
of evidence, Harris moved to dismiss counts one, two, and twelve. The trial court granted Harris’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
State v. Charles W. Dawn
of sentence and the entry of judgment were delayed until 1989, when the trial court imposed a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
of sentence and the entry of judgment were delayed until 1989, when the trial court imposed a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
for postconviction relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13070 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13070 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terrance L. Richardson
a new trial on the false imprisonment, burglary and sexual assault charges based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15363 - 2005-03-31
a new trial on the false imprisonment, burglary and sexual assault charges based on ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15363 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kareem Q. Curry
, the jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence and the effectiveness of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6742 - 2005-03-31
, the jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence and the effectiveness of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
Darryl H. Stegall appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court after he pleaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21
Darryl H. Stegall appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court after he pleaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21
Susan Hanmer v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.
against Dr. Frank Beran and Fort Atkinson Medical Center, S.C. They contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8052 - 2005-03-31
against Dr. Frank Beran and Fort Atkinson Medical Center, S.C. They contend that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
division component of his divorce judgment. He claims the trial court failed to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21
division component of his divorce judgment. He claims the trial court failed to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21432 - 2017-09-21