Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 46120 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 46120 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. I reject Adekale’s argument that he was unreasonably transported because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630911 - 2023-03-09
sobriety tests. I reject Adekale’s argument that he was unreasonably transported because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630911 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
2020 OWI Guidelines District 10
$987.50 8 0 Yes .20 + or Refusal of Breath Test $987.50 8 $1050.50 9 0 Yes 1st w
/publications/fees/docs/d10owi2020.pdf - 2021-01-21
$987.50 8 0 Yes .20 + or Refusal of Breath Test $987.50 8 $1050.50 9 0 Yes 1st w
/publications/fees/docs/d10owi2020.pdf - 2021-01-21
[PDF]
10th Judicial District OWI Guidelines
0 Yes .20 + or Refusal of Breath Test $1,087.50 8 $1,150.50 9 0 Yes 1st w/ minor
/publications/fees/docs/d10owi2023.pdf - 2023-09-22
0 Yes .20 + or Refusal of Breath Test $1,087.50 8 $1,150.50 9 0 Yes 1st w/ minor
/publications/fees/docs/d10owi2023.pdf - 2023-09-22
State v. Albert L. Black
) testing. Black contends the court erred because Wis. Stat. § 972.11(5) bars the admissibility of all DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
) testing. Black contends the court erred because Wis. Stat. § 972.11(5) bars the admissibility of all DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Albert L. Black
2 profile evidence obtained through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Black contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26169 - 2017-09-21
2 profile evidence obtained through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Black contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26169 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Bessert
his motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment.[2] ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
his motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment.[2] ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Saich
his motions to suppress evidence of the results of a blood test that was administered following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
his motions to suppress evidence of the results of a blood test that was administered following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2380 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ramon R. Rodriguez
to conduct field sobriety tests, the detention impermissibly extended beyond that which is permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7263 - 2017-09-20
to conduct field sobriety tests, the detention impermissibly extended beyond that which is permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7263 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ramon R. Rodriguez
station to conduct field sobriety tests, the detention impermissibly extended beyond that which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7263 - 2005-03-31
station to conduct field sobriety tests, the detention impermissibly extended beyond that which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Farrell
the results of his blood test. He concludes the circuit court was in error because a breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3532 - 2017-09-19
the results of his blood test. He concludes the circuit court was in error because a breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3532 - 2017-09-19