Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 49855 for our.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 49855 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factors warranting relief. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP328
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210927 - 2018-04-06
factors warranting relief. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP328
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210927 - 2018-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supports our conclusion that C.S.S.’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, we reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
supports our conclusion that C.S.S.’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, we reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stop was extended beyond its initial scope. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10
stop was extended beyond its initial scope. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Tremaine Y.
, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7614 - 2017-09-19
, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7614 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—are irrelevant based on our conclusion regarding the issue of burden of proof. See Maryland Arms Ltd. P’ship v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23
—are irrelevant based on our conclusion regarding the issue of burden of proof. See Maryland Arms Ltd. P’ship v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
, or its findings of fact do not support its order. WIS. STAT. § 102.23(1)(e). We do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55305 - 2014-09-15
, or its findings of fact do not support its order. WIS. STAT. § 102.23(1)(e). We do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55305 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a person under the age of thirteen. 4 Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194247 - 2017-09-21
with a person under the age of thirteen. 4 Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194247 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
As background to this appeal, we repeat some of the facts from our 1995 opinion following Morgan’s direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57399 - 2014-09-15
As background to this appeal, we repeat some of the facts from our 1995 opinion following Morgan’s direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57399 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
several challenges to his convictions. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92228 - 2013-01-28
several challenges to his convictions. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92228 - 2013-01-28
CA Blank Order
own defense. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140095 - 2015-04-15
own defense. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140095 - 2015-04-15