Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea.[2] He argues his plea was not knowing and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48059 - 2010-03-22
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea.[2] He argues his plea was not knowing and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48059 - 2010-03-22
2007 WI APP 174
of the residence. The officers ran after Sanders in order to take him into custody. The officers followed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29272 - 2007-07-24
of the residence. The officers ran after Sanders in order to take him into custody. The officers followed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29272 - 2007-07-24
[PDF]
WI APP 174
. No. 2006AP2060-CR 3 The officers ran after Sanders in order to take him into custody. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29272 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2006AP2060-CR 3 The officers ran after Sanders in order to take him into custody. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29272 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 156
of a child and an order denying his postconviction motion. Peebles argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55677 - 2014-09-15
of a child and an order denying his postconviction motion. Peebles argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea.2 He argues his plea was not knowing and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48059 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea.2 He argues his plea was not knowing and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48059 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. This is Hipsher’s third appeal. See State v. Hipsher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76556 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. This is Hipsher’s third appeal. See State v. Hipsher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76556 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rafeal D. Newson
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19655 - 2005-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. This is Hipsher’s third appeal. See State v. Hipsher, No. 2002AP2461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76556 - 2012-01-17
motion for postconviction relief. This is Hipsher’s third appeal. See State v. Hipsher, No. 2002AP2461
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76556 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Rafeal D. Newson
from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 postconviction motion. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19655 - 2017-09-21
from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 postconviction motion. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19655 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, which sought reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11
] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, which sought reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127139 - 2014-11-11