Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13251 - 13260 of 58546 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Christopher L.
he is entitled to a new trial because he has a due No. 2005AP2857-CR 2 process right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26325 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
that the facts, as found by the trial court, do not support Grothmann’s contention that the warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2009-10 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2898-CR 2 new trial. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72225 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, and one count of battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.09, and an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12

[PDF] State v. Rovaughn Hill
the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2196 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12675 - 2005-03-31

Shawn Carlson v. Frank B. Gleichsner
that because he sold the vehicle “as is” and the trial court found that he and Carlson knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7529 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. At the second trial, the jury convicted Alexander of both charges. Alexander filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106834 - 2014-01-13

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for DNA testing and postconviction relief. Perkins argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29