Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13251 - 13260 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 13251 - 13260 of 58547 for speedy trial.
State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
that the facts, as found by the trial court, do not support Grothmann’s contention that the warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
that the facts, as found by the trial court, do not support Grothmann’s contention that the warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are to the 2009-10 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2898-CR 2 new trial. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72225 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2009-10 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2898-CR 2 new trial. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72225 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and one count of battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.09, and an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
, and one count of battery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.09, and an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Rovaughn Hill
the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2196 - 2017-09-19
the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on double jeopardy grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2196 - 2017-09-19
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12675 - 2005-03-31
trial without finding him in contempt; (5) and the court was biased against Kim and erred by giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12675 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. At the second trial, the jury convicted Alexander of both charges. Alexander filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106834 - 2014-01-13
. At the second trial, the jury convicted Alexander of both charges. Alexander filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106834 - 2014-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for DNA testing and postconviction relief. Perkins argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29
postconviction motion for DNA testing and postconviction relief. Perkins argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29
2008 WI APP 151
) the trial court erred by granting the motion and petition without holding an evidentiary hearing; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34120 - 2011-06-14
) the trial court erred by granting the motion and petition without holding an evidentiary hearing; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34120 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
Mary Herr v. Rodolph J. Lanaghan
argues that the trial court erroneously: (1) reopened the civil judgment against DeBraska; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21
argues that the trial court erroneously: (1) reopened the civil judgment against DeBraska; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21580 - 2017-09-21